Home Management By Ruth M0,... Tlâ€"IE Aw YOURL oaiHiOFeli UKITCH EN Hieroglyphics. Translated, however, it simâ€" ply means the work triangle in your kitchen that is, the route you take from sink, to stove, to refrigerator, as you prepare your family’s meals. three times each day. Whether it’s in an L, or U, or Corridor-shaped kitchen, or even one of the newer Peninsula types, it's the length of the three sides of that triangle that counts and the number of times you walk it in the course of one meal's preparation. For any who think these mealâ€"time triangle tours aren’t too import, a study of some 55 farm women in the States has come up with some in- teresting information. In almost 90% of these kitchens it was found the housewife walked ap- proximately 43 miles a year during the preparaâ€" tion of only two of the three days’ meals. The solution of mileage such as this sounds very simple. Just see to it that the sides of the triangle are shortened to make a step-saving route between sink, stove and food storage area. Sad to say, as many of us know, that isn't as simple as it sounds. In the past, unfortunately, ar- chitects haven‘t always though about this angle of kitchen planning. Too often doors and windows were put in just anywhere at all. leaving only a minimum amount of wall space against which the equipment has to be placed. Our kitchen at home is an example of that. A small room to begin with, it has five doors and two windows! This means you can change the work triangle very THE TITLE may remind you of Egyptian little. if at allâ€"there's no place left to whim, . . 0 can swrtch the equtpment. y u Fortunately, however, shifting is quite when possible. For example, unless the door is UF-Zl‘ling to the wrong side, the refrigerator can on n. he moved closer to the sink. And if the sin, . can be edged even a few steps closer, then tht walk from refrigerator to sink to stove becomes . eon jaunt rather than a small day's journey. As you go about shortening the work 1. me there are other problems to keep in minv (Ln you keep it out of the way of the family m: lanes? And Can you plan adequate countcv me about each of the three work areas? Du [he new arrangement allow for counter or tahh no: near the refrigerator where you can 10.: and unload food supplies? Do you have flti me space, convenient to both sink and refrig tor. for a mixing area? And does it give you .ple work space near the stove for serving food! This is where a small, easy-moving ta: , on casters comes in handy. It can double for any usesâ€"at the stove for serving food, at H re- frigerator for loading and unloading. By th- ml; it holds the stacked dishes from the dining this or carries the clean dishes back to the up- board. The shape and dimensions of a [Maori de- signed kitchen can't always be changed. BI its worth a try to rearrange equipment for xi [er mileage each day. Farm Daughters -An Occupational Sure y By Helen C. Abell, Ph.D. makers were interviewed by staff of the Home Economics Services, a total of 1,065 living children had been born to these farm women. Although about three-fourths of these children were attending school or Were of pre-school age, there were 365 who had completed school (183 boys and 182 girls) and had entered the adult phase of their lives. A continuously decreasing number of today's adult farm-born children are following the occu- pational paths of their parents. Only 4 of each 10 of these adult sons were engaged in farming. A much lower proportion (2 of each 10) adult daughters had followed their mother‘s life pattern of becoming farm home- makers. Although 53 of these daughters were unmar- ried at the time of the survey 129 were married and of these only 34 were living on a farm with their husbands. IN JULY 1959 when 352 Ontario farm home- Profound changes in Canadian rural lit are also reflected by the findings that athOD‘. =he unmarried adult daughters practically all m in some type of paid employment. The most reâ€" quent types being clerical or professional it. About half of these single girls had moved ‘ a city or town where they were employee. nd about half were living with their parents t a farm and commuting daily to their place or Inâ€" ployment. AIDODE the 129 married daughters about 0- tn every four (26 per cent) had some type of wild employment in addition to homemaking re~ um- sibilities. This factor was most in evidence 3-". Int those married daughters who were living in a City or town in Ontario (31 of 100 were i‘ 3 Paid i013). It was in the proportion of 23 ot' :00 amOhE those married daughters who were hung with their husbands on a farm on their em. 11 was considerably lower (8 of 100) among “035 at an urban address outside of the Provinct 0f HOME AND COUNTRY