°C eE â€" commollh [ I.e«'H‘;' E J s | Jw aa reader defends South Africaâ€" Sir: _ i I have been 2 domiciled Canadian | old adage be observed "beli \ ° | "Hrease allow me equal spage in for several Â¥E8TS. y> _ Dothing you heat and only ht;ffhigï¬ | 4* .. 4 your newspaper to respond to Mrs. It is 1'78 ; enough for_ meid g see‘‘ of media condemnation, | ; i Woodcock‘s impressions of South â€" remain silent watching °’,‘9'§‘: No country is perfect, least of all _ t 1 Africa (Cobden SUD June 18th, _ reports 01 national teleV;ilnni South Africa, put its history is very _‘ | 1986). It is the country of my itth â€" hearing the pé'?JUdlc_e on 884002 â€" similar to Canada‘s and it is in this and 1 will always have a If der â€" radio and TEading distorted views vein that 1 wish t0 explain the J spot in my healt for it Alffough | in the national, newspapet® 3t3 problems (whith Dessh . that | politics there, Of here in G@nada, . Cobden is MY | Stomping g‘,"’““h beautiful country No ten day | have never been my L;’;rtlcular and I feel compelled to defend that | sojourn (or three WEEKks or three { \_ jnterest or activity, unfair condemâ€" muehâ€"maligned . country thO48h months for that matter) in any . f nation _ of ; South Africa is your newspaper, and to advise | > something 1 deplore, eyel though those readers interested that the . See page 6 |