2s 2 h 4 2 on e n ; eventual downfall of the Tory dyâ€" SChOOls nasty under Miller. â€" ommomemeccemenmnoin o °,“'; E1 . 4 § Sterï¬ng couldn‘t help but take a o s s io i | ced e _ last shot at Davis, saying the > _ _ ooo _ _ § Eow seeares catnolie Tory cauens found out about _ o wefokoa. . Davis‘s intention to support full â€" o > â€" tet LWAAA _ _ _| high school funds s PDo c s / aly i & _ _ _ [ i t funding only three hours before 2. ocis O B 2 o lieve in." 7 the announcement. s e o e o e | Sterling first spoke out against Full Ca!:holic»funding seemed to i n 2 o W»’ i K > e â€" the legislation in May 1985, three be a nonâ€"issue in last year‘s elecâ€" M o. 3 TK o4 & * <~ e 0 i months after he was dropped tion campaign until Lewis Garnâ€" tE son ue e .. . ~ i \ from former premier Frank Millâ€" SWorthy, former Anglican archâ€" 29 2 ~ #. *4 0 8 i er‘s cabinet. bishop of Toronto, compared e â€" wl ; 2 8 He urged Peterson to withhold Davis‘s decision to Adolf Hitler‘s f â€" MAE , / P & ; the legislation until the Supreme "government by decree." ; . ce w / 2 9 £ ‘~Court of Canada had tested it. It was the fear of massive eroâ€" ol y J ~ s , f The new law, which has already. . sion of funding for the public e % . " survived one constitutional chalâ€" school system, job losses for â€" M \CH ww f/ lenge in the Ontario Court of Apâ€" . teachers in that system and reâ€" + Py y 4 + peal and is still to be contested in â€" sentment of what opponents saw * M / â€" W B ssz.~* . i1 ks the Supreme Court, calls for exâ€" as preferential treatment for one 9A e e + e io . tension over three years of full religion that sparked bitter proâ€" t * {g;' 35 public grants. for grades 11 to 13 test by many: groups before the .. 41‘ 6 K in the Catholic system. . legislative committee holding pubâ€" t A ¢ Fae _ â€"A The process began last Septemâ€" lic hearings on the bill. & / 5 u> m 1 d | ber for Grade 11 under interim _ Conway said he expects the Suâ€" s <~ o | B measures passed by cabinet order _ preme Court â€" like the Ontario _ PM â€" a mechanism also challenged Court of Appeal â€" to uphold the . o 0 0 y M but upheld by the courts. Full â€" right of the Catholic school sysâ€" Pul. e _ â€" y #/1 funding is expected to cost about tem to maintain the unique religâ€" & S .. i s [ / s $350 million when complete. ious character of its schools & < L s & C!tlï¬er tth@El aï¬em‘ilzdtbfll,f nogâ€" through discriminatory hiring. i d atholic students who transfer to . d m e ce |/ w Catholic schools will be exempt T'â€'g 0,"“;,"3 Secondary School s oi / us from religious classes on request. eachers‘ Federation â€" one of ~(| ' c s i 7 § he most vocal d t . 95 sa > /. MB In addition, Catholic boards will t A groups opposed to © MR es e . not be allowed, after a 10â€"year full fundu.lg â€" said t_he mos_t seriâ€" h. Y homl . / Sm . : s ous flaw in the law is that it will + â€"p l w j J 8 transition phase, to discriminate cextend" discfiminaf (e Subh . fa _ i. in hiring policies against NOD® | pynange unination 9 PUbHG g _ ~__ e Catholic teachers or other emâ€" °*D"""~ s _ s ployees. j 7 4 "June 23 thmay well go down in Davis‘s announcement June 12, history as the day on which the The top student i 1994, caused a furore among Onâ€" public school system of Ontario Ditth rp rs \% x ': grade 13 .geography, Carolym tario residents â€" as much, it was fragmented to the disadvanâ€" 7 urner, received a scholarship from teacher Stu $ seemed, for the arbitrary manner . tage of all Ontario secondary Jack. She also received three other awards as well as in which it was announced as â€" school students and at a cost of tbeing named an Ontario Scholar. what it actually proposed. hundreds of millions of dollars to Wfly 2. / § 6 7 It was blamed in large part for | Ontario taxpayers," said Rod Alâ€" â€" ~weme $i.â€".. ame dï¬ 7. Bs se the loss of 20 Conservative seats ‘bert, president of the 35,000â€"memâ€" in the May 1985 election and the ber federation. x